patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Do You Agree or Disagree With The Boy Scouts of America's Decision to Exclude Gay Members?

Earlier this month, the Boy Scouts of America reaffirmed its policy of excluding gays. Some Eagle Scouts are taking exception to this ruling.

 

Some Eagle Scouts are distancing themselves from the Boy Scouts of America.

The rank of Eagle Scout is the highest rank a boy scout can receive and is the crowning achievement of a scouting career.

On July 17, after a two year review, an 11-member committee of the Boy Scouts of America voted unanimously to uphold its policy of excluding members based on their sexuality. The policy includes adult leaders and scouts.

“The vast majority of the parents of youth we serve value their right to address issues of same-sex orientation within their family, with spiritual advisers, and at the appropriate time and in the right setting,” said Bob Mazzuca, Chief Scout Executive, Boy Scouts of America in a statement. “While a majority of our membership agrees with our policy, we fully understand that no single policy will accommodate the many diverse views among our membership or society.”

Some Eagle Scouts who disagree with the policy have returned their medals.

The website Boing Boing features letters from Eagle Scouts requesting that the executive board of Boy Scouts of America reconsider its policy against gays.

A Facebook group Eagle Scouts for Equality gives a deadline of Founder's Day 2013 to revoke the policy or revoke the rank of Eagle Scout from the members who have signed onto the Facebook group.

Do you agree or disagree with the Boy Scouts of America's policy on excluding gays? Let us know in the comments. If you are an Eagle Scout, would you resign from the organization or send back your badge if you disagreed with the policy against gay members?

Related Topics: Ban on Gays and Boy Scouts of America

Margaret Carroll-Bergman

11:46 am on Friday, July 27, 2012

Let's hear from scouts, present and past and especially Eagle Scouts. Parents and group leaders and the general public are also encouraged to comment.

Reply

David Krasner

1:14 pm on Friday, July 27, 2012

The Boy Scouts have made a horrible decision. Shameful, disgraceful, and undignified. Why not also base it on skin color, religion, nationality, etc. This is embarrassing to the Scouts and the Nation.

Reply

Arthur Dent

2:03 pm on Friday, July 27, 2012

Although I disagree with the Boy Scouts decision, It is not really a shock, considering that they are a christian based group. I do find it ironic and kind of ridiculous that, just like the US Military, gays have been members since they both were formed. The military finally accepted that fact and removed the barriers to gays serving openly. The Boy Scouts however, seem to be perfectly comfortable in their ignorance and bigoted thinking. I'm sure Jesus would have a few choice words for them on how to treat our fellow man.

Reply

Tim from the Bog

4:08 pm on Friday, July 27, 2012

It's a private organization. It is up to them. The left is pretty good at chastising what they consider intolerant, making them intolerant themselves.
I'm thinking of making up some tee shirts that say" tolerate my intolerance".
I don't hear the left speaking out about the muslim position on guy rights. Very hypocritical.

Reply

Sean

4:26 pm on Friday, July 27, 2012

cleary if gays were in the boyscouts they would have some more modern looking uniforms

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Casey Meserve

5:01 pm on Friday, July 27, 2012

The Boy Scouts also refuse to accept people who don't believe in god into their ranks, however, there are ways of getting around it...sort of a "don't ask, don't tell" policy.

Reply

Tim from the Bog

5:58 pm on Friday, July 27, 2012

I don't think they allow women either.

Reply

Mark

6:41 am on Saturday, July 28, 2012

I find this question to be as ignorant as "Do you agree or disagree with the United Negro College Fund's decision to exclude all non-black children?"

Whether you agree or not they are private organizations that can do as they please.

Reply

Joe Hayes

7:03 am on Saturday, July 28, 2012

It wasn't all that long ago when people of different races were denied the right to marry. We look back on those laws, and those who supported them, with a bit of embarrassment and disbelief. There will come a time, indeed it's already here for many, when policies such as these make us cringe in the same way. That the Boy Scouts are still following a policy of bigotry and discrimination in 2012 is ridiculous, mean-spirited, and absurd.

Reply

Tim

9:36 am on Saturday, July 28, 2012

It is a private organization. You're free to have your opinion on the matter, but, do not force your beliefs upon someone and demand that they change to your satisfaction. I am a straight Caucasian man. As so, there are many groups or organizations that I would not fit well in… And I am fine with that. If excluding gays rocks your boat that much, feel free to create your own new organization. This is the land of freedom. When someone or an organization is strong-armed into changing to conform to others beliefs… That is not freedom!

Reply

Kathleen DeWitt

10:28 am on Saturday, July 28, 2012

I don't necessarily believe in what they are doing. but like Tim said, it's my opinion. It's their organization and they can do what they want to do. I think his comment hits the nail right on the head. Nanakate

Reply

lulu

8:08 pm on Saturday, July 28, 2012

Was thinking that tOO Sean ... : ))

Reply

Bill Rowan

9:07 pm on Saturday, July 28, 2012

The greatest empire on earth, the Roman Empire, fell due to moral decay. Our nation seems to be headed in the same direction. It's about time individuals, companies (like Chick-fil-A, and organizations like the Boy Scouts stand up and be counted for what's right and oppose what's wrong. The Bible clearly opposes homosexuality - that's what led to the fall of Sodom and Gomorrah! As a Christian, I'm to hate the sin, but love the sinner. I can't condone that which is sin. Liberalism has gone too far in our country - and in others. And just because it's popular doesn't mean it's right. Way to go Boy Scouts!

Reply

Bruce Stuart

3:13 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

The logical progression from allowing gays in Boy Scouts, and Girl Scouts is to have both organizations be coed, at which point then you might as well merge the two. Is that where you want to go?

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Casey Meserve

3:17 pm on Friday, October 19, 2012

That's what the Boy Scouts have done in Europe. It's worked quite well there, from what I understand.

Leave a comment